Coding print quality and substrate testing
Validation guide

Coding print quality and substrate testing

Approve ink or ribbon, code quality and finished-pack durability using production materials and a recorded test method.

Use a controlled sample plan

Print quality is the result of a complete combination: printer, ink or ribbon, material, message, settings, speed, environment and handling.

Collect samples that represent production rather than only the easiest material. Include every different film, label coating, carton finish, bottle colour or surface treatment that could affect adhesion or contrast. Record supplier and material references so the approved result can be traced.

Prepare the full production message. Use the smallest character, narrowest barcode feature, largest data layout and every variable field expected in normal operation. A short date-only sample does not prove that a dense barcode, logo or multi-line job will work at the same speed.

Run at normal and maximum expected line conditions. Record speed, product pitch, print distance, print energy or quality settings, ink or ribbon, ambient conditions and drying or cooling time. Where the printer is installed on VFFS or flow wrapping equipment, inspect the code again after forming and sealing.

Adhesion and rub testing should reflect the real exposure. The project may require dry rub, contact with belts or guides, oil, water, condensation, heat, cold, cleaning chemicals or storage. There is no universal pass result in this guide because the customer must define what the code needs to survive.

For a barcode, QR or DataMatrix symbol, agree the scanner or verifier and the acceptance threshold before testing. Keep the code size, quiet area, contrast and substrate fixed when comparing printers. A symbol that scans once under ideal lighting is not automatically approved for the production process.

Retain an approved sample and the conditions that produced it. That reference helps operators and service engineers distinguish a printer fault from a changed substrate, consumable or line condition later.

Suggested print trial record

RecordDetails to captureReason
MaterialSupplier, reference, colour, coating, print side, batch and sample condition.Small material changes can alter adhesion and contrast.
ConsumableInk or ribbon reference, batch where needed, storage and installation date.The approved result belongs to the consumable/substrate combination.
MessageJob name, text, date/batch fields, barcode or 2D data, size and orientation.Message density and dimensions affect speed and readability.
Printer settingsResolution, quality/energy, speed, delay, print distance or pressure and mode.Settings must be repeatable after service or changeover.
Line conditionsNormal and maximum speed, pitch, movement, trigger, environment and downstream contact.A bench sample may not reproduce production behaviour.
Acceptance resultPosition, completeness, contrast, adhesion/rub, scanner or verifier and approver.The pass condition and method must be unambiguous.

The supplied media provides real coding references. It does not replace a documented trial on the customer’s own material.

What to observe

  • Product or web stability at the printhead.
  • Trigger position and code location.
  • Access for consumable replacement and cleaning.
  • Time available before the printed surface touches another component.
Thermal inkjet date and batch code samples printed onto cartonsThermal overprinter sample showing variable text and a barcodeThermal transfer overprinter mounted above flexible packaging film

Challenge samples for verification and reject tests

Create known faults so the inspection and response can be proved without relying on random production failures.

Missing or incomplete print

Use blank, pale and partially missing samples within the range the system is expected to detect.

Position and content faults

Challenge displaced codes, wrong job data, reversed or malformed symbols and an old batch or date value.

Handling damage

Use rubbed, smeared, stretched, heated or condensed samples where those conditions represent the real process.

How many samples are needed for a coding trial?

Enough material is needed to set up, run at normal and maximum speed, test starts and stops, create challenge samples and retain approved references. The exact quantity depends on the host machine and pack.

Can a sample be approved immediately after printing?

Only if immediate appearance is the complete requirement. Most applications should also check the code after its normal drying or cooling time and downstream handling.

What is a rub-resistance test?

It is a controlled check of whether the code remains acceptable after defined contact. The material, force, number of strokes and pass result should reflect the customer’s real handling risk.

Why should the largest message be tested?

A larger or denser job can need more print time, ribbon, ink and processing than a short date code, affecting speed and readability.

Does a successful handheld scan approve a barcode?

It proves that one device decoded one sample under those conditions. If a controlled quality result is required, specify the verifier, method and acceptance threshold.

What should be retained after approval?

Keep representative printed samples, the material and consumable references, message, printer settings, line conditions, inspection result and approval date.

Prepare production samples for a coding trial

Send the exact substrate, full message, intended speed, downstream exposure and scanner or verifier requirement.

Arrange a sample review

Use an evidence ladder from print sample to released pack

A printer demonstration proves that a mark can be produced. Production approval requires evidence that the approved message remains legible and correctly associated with the pack after realistic printing, handling and inspection.

1

Material qualification

Record supplier, construction, coating, colour, print side, temperature and any moisture, dust, oil or chemical exposure.

2

Establish settings and presentation limits for contrast, transfer, drying, adhesion, position and legibility.

3

Machine-readable checks

Separate a scanner decode from formal barcode verification and compare the decoded data with the authorised job where required.

4

Line and handling trial

Run speed changes, gaps, starts, stops, downstream contact, sealing, cooling, abrasion and storage conditions relevant to the pack.

Observed failureEvidence to collect before adjustmentNext guide
Faint or incomplete printSubstrate lot, consumable, printhead condition, gap, speed, pressure or energy setting and a dated sample.Troubleshooting guide
Smearing or poor adhesionDrying time, surface condition, ink or ribbon reference, downstream contact and the exact rub or exposure method.Consumables and maintenance
Barcode or 2D-code failureSymbology, encoded data, size, quiet zones, background, distortion, scanner result and verifier result where required.GS1 2D guide
Wrong or missing code passesInspection type, target data, camera image, product tracking, reject signal and reject confirmation.Vision and reject guide

Define the test before producing the sample

Agree the pass criteria, sample conditioning, handling and record format so the result is repeatable and relevant to production.

Plan a coding trial

Questions that make coding trials repeatable

A useful trial controls the sample condition, test method, handling sequence and acceptance decision so the result can be repeated in production.

How should conditioning time be chosen before an adhesion check?

Conditioning time should reflect when the real pack will be handled, inspected, packed or released. Some codes may appear dry immediately but continue to change as the carrier evaporates or the ribbon transfer settles. The trial should therefore include the earliest realistic contact and any later check needed by the process.

Record temperature, humidity and elapsed time with the test result. A pass without those conditions is difficult to compare with another trial or a later production complaint.

What makes a rub test repeatable between trials?

A repeatable rub test defines the contact material, pressure or applied load, stroke length, number and direction of strokes, conditioning time and pass or fail criterion. Simply rubbing a sample by hand can be useful for screening, but it does not provide a controlled comparison between inks, ribbons or substrates.

The chosen method should reflect the actual downstream exposure, such as belts, guides, case packing or manual handling, without claiming a formal standard unless that standard is genuinely being followed.

Why should code position be measured on the finished pack rather than the flat material?

Forming, sealing, cutting, folding, labelling and product tension can move the apparent code position between the flat web or blank and the finished pack. Measuring only the unformed material can approve a print that later crosses a seal, curve, edge or artwork area.

Record the finished-pack reference points and tolerance used by production or quality. The code-position guide explains how to choose those references.

When should scanner testing be separated from formal symbol verification?

Scanner testing answers whether a chosen device can decode the symbol under the test condition. Formal verification assesses defined symbol-quality parameters against the applicable barcode standard. Separate the two when customer, retailer, regulatory or quality requirements demand graded evidence rather than a simple successful scan.

Agree the symbol, data, verifier, standard and acceptance level before the trial. A smartphone or general scanner can support usability checks but should not be presented as formal verification evidence.

Run the coding trial against a written acceptance method

Send the real material, full message, expected handling and the check that will decide pass or fail.

Plan a coding trial

Turn the test method into a sample-trial brief

Use the written test method to identify the packs, messages, consumables, production states and post-print exposures that must be demonstrated. This prevents a trial being judged from one attractive sample that does not represent normal operation.

Build the sample matrix

The coding-machine sample printing and trials page provides a structured matrix for material, geometry, message, movement and handling.

Retain the accepted baseline

Keep the approved sample, machine and consumable identity, settings, conditioning, test method and result so production and support teams can distinguish drift from an approved change.

Contact us